Bible Notes Online - Isaiah 36 - ESV
Commentary

Chapters 36 to 39 provide a historical interlude, relating events of Hezekiah's life.

v1-2: There had been eight years since Israel's defeat. Sennacherib had successfully attacked other towns in Judah, but Jerusalem remained defiant. This was the heart of Jewish life and religion, the capital city. The king of Assyria was still at Lachish, while he sent his field commander (the Rabshakeh) to Jerusalem, see 37.8. The attack had been prophesied by Isaiah, see 8.7-8; 10.24-34.

For us, the enemy may bring us to defeat, but He cannot take away our Saviour; see also the promise in 37.35

v3: Eliakim, mentioned in 22.20-25; this faithful man was promised great blessings from God.

v4-5: "What are you basing this confidence of yours?"

  • In 1 Sam 4.3, Israel had trusted in the ark;
  • In Mic 6.6-7, they trusted in sacrifices and ritual;
  • In Josh 7.2-5, they trusted in past blessing.

Trusting in good things is not the same as trusting in God Himself.

v6: Sennacherib thought that Hezekiah was trusting in Egypt, "that splintered reed."

v7: Hezekiah had destroyed the numerous altars around the land, and re-introduced temple worship (see 2 Chr 29-31). It was "after these deeds" that Sennacherib had attacked. Here was a challenge to Hezekiah, 'Would he continue to trust the Lord in the difficult situation? Would he re-introduce idolatry?'

Sennacherib, through his field commander (Rabshakeh) could not understand Hezekiah's spiritual attitude, so he mocked his reforms. Hezekiah had not removed the Lord's high places and altars. There was a further inference of Hezekiah's pride, insisting on worship at "this altar," i.e: Hezekiah's altar. The Assyrians would have been familiar with a form of pagan worship where there were numerous altars and shrines; they mocked the comparative simplicity of Jewish worship of God.

v8-9: The offer of peace and surrender, although mixed with sarcasm, that Judah's army was weak and small.

v10: His further attack, that he had been given the Lord's approval to attack Jerusalem.

The whole speech contains inconsistent lines of argument, each of which was designed to discourage the people, and to shake their trust in God.

v11-15: The Jews' request, that the field commander address them in Aramaic, rather than Hebrew, so that only the more educated could understand. But the field commander's words were aimed at all the people, to stir up dissent in the camp.

v16-17 The false promises of the enemy; "Make peace." The further promise was that they would receive another land "like your own." The Assyrians wanted to remove the people of Judah, just as they had to Israel, 2 Kings 17.23. The promises here echo the earlier promises of God when the people were in Egypt, that they would inherit a land flowing with milk and honey. Yet no one can offer anything greater than God can give.

The enemy of our souls makes similar promises, to make peace with sin, to tolerate wrongdoing; but that always leads us into compromise or rebellion. The Lord's way may be costly, but is always the best way.

v18-20: The next argument, that resistance was futile, since no other "god" had been able to deliver its nation from the might of Assyria. Nation after nation is listed, indicating Assyria's succession of victories.

v21-22: Silence was the answer, and is indeed sometimes our best answer. Here the people's silence indicated their unity against the enemy. A quick response, even with wise words, is not always the best route to take; the Lord Jesus commanded that we do not cast our pearls of wisdom before swine.

Eliakim, Shebna, Joah did not revile in return, just as David did not react against Saul or Shimei.

Even so, we notice that the leaders were discouraged, and tore their clothes.